<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full Websites VS Landing Pages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nickthrolson.com/full-websites-vs-landing-pages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nickthrolson.com/full-websites-vs-landing-pages/</link>
	<description>Super Affiliate sharing ways to make money online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:04:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Forest</title>
		<link>http://nickthrolson.com/full-websites-vs-landing-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-1379</link>
		<dc:creator>Forest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickthrolson.com/?p=844#comment-1379</guid>
		<description>I agree Nick, long term is best and full sites will ultimately perform better.

Like your affiliate compare site... in the long run you will benefit from the effort you put into this as a full site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Nick, long term is best and full sites will ultimately perform better.</p>
<p>Like your affiliate compare site&#8230; in the long run you will benefit from the effort you put into this as a full site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->